IS ISLAM A FAKE?
By Ahmed Simon
ABOUT THE DECEIT IN ISLAM
Warning – This article is for men, women and children who have the ability to think.
Human beings are born free, are Free to talk, Free to choose our friends and free to do whatever we THINK we want to do. Our laws are enshrined with all these cardinal points of various individual freedoms, especially in non-Muslim nations. And above all, the greatest freedom we have is the freedom of thought. Absolute followers cannot and will never be freethinkers. Just like sheep, they need only brainlessly follow like morons. The choices rational human beings make, are based on their individual capacity to THINK for themselves. Freedom in thought to believe in anything we want, is our greatest asset. If we think something is not to our needs, we can rethink and are free to change our minds. It is up to the rational thinking person to THINK and come to a conclusion and act as concluded. From the creation of man, God gave us the brain to THINK critically and held us responsible for our actions from the very beginning of the human race. The true genuine nature of God demands and expects rational thinking of his created humans.
In Islam, Allah (Muslim God) demands believers (Muslims) to surrender to him completely and to obey his every command in the Quran in its totality. Allah states in the Quran that everything recorded in the Quran are of his own words. Allah’s unconditional demands in the Quran to his followers are absolute. Muslim scholars of more then 200 Islamic sects, agree, confirm and believe this is absolutely true, and it is mandatory to obey Allah’s commands in the Quran, with no reservation of any kind by every Muslim. (No ‘buts’ allowed).
The Quran is a book of an imperfect scripture (with errors, contradictions, stupidities, historical inaccuracies and with only 114 chapters against the Bible’s 1,179 chapters). The chapters of the Quran are not arranged in importance, continuity, sacredness, biography, chronology, significance or sequence of any sort, but are arranged simply by length - the longest chapter, followed by the next longest chapter and the last chapter with just 6 lines. Verses are disorderly arranged and jumbled up in unrelated subjects/topics. Christians will be horrified to know that there is no prophecy, no chronology, no geography, no biography of anybody (not even Muhammad), no ministry, no history, no proverbs, no parables, no miracles, no psalms, no sequence of any sort in the Quran; and generally is just do’s and don’t, like an instruction book of a vacuum cleaner; and with punitive punishments, reprisals and rewards specified. In stark contrast, the Bible is the only religious scripture in this entire world (which contains everything the Quran does not have, as mentioned above, and which begins chronologically with the creation of this universe and the human race; and ends with the universe and the human race. No other religious Scripture, anywhere in this world, can categorically state such a Complete Testimony of the universe and the human race and that too in an accurate chronological setting from the beginning to the end. The Quran is not a book for the intelligent and the rational thinking person, as I will prove its illogic, fraud and stupidity in the following items, which makes it a fake.
In view of Allah’s demand on believers for absolute and unconditional obedience, Allah states categorically, (Sura 33.36) [“And it becometh not a believing man or a believing woman, when Allah and his messenger have decided an affair (for them), that they should (after that) claim any say in their affair; and whoso is rebellious to Allah and his messenger, he verily go astray in error manifest.”] So believers (Muslims) have no right to think independently in their own affairs, because Allah and his messenger have already done the thinking for them, and all the Muslims are required to do is, to just obey (like sheep) their Allah’s words as in the Quran, and becoming totally obedient morons. If Muslims do not obey and follow, they will be considered by Allah as rebellious and face the consequences. But, in the same breath (Sura) Allah also demands Muslims to obey his human messenger (giving equal status as mentioned) with Allah? No other religion on earth demands absolute and unconditional obedience to a human messenger. This is unique only in Islam and defies all logic. In stark contrast, the Christian Bible in the words of the Lord, demand followers to have independent rational thinking and to even test/question/challenge all prophets rationally for the truth. Why shouldn’t Muslims use their God-given brains for independent rational thinking in their own affairs, as the Christians do? Like a magician, once he gets people to believe in his optical illusions, he has complete control of everything he wants people to believe. By taking control of your mind, and getting other believers to force those not in control, is this not depriving Muslims from questioning and leaving Islam if the need be? Either you believe or are forced by believers to conform and hold the grip. Almost everything in Islam is forced upon, with no choices, and against rational thinking people’s will. Exceptional rewards are promised to believers, to keep Muslims within Islam’s grip. Islam is sure a trap with no way out, and if a Muslim tries to get out, will be killed as an apostate (Sura 4:89). Isn’t this why Muslims dare not criticise Muslims who commit murder, bombings, etc? So, with no rational thinking allowed, Islam has proved itself to be a trap. Is this from God or a fake religion?
Once someone gets control of believers in an ideology, then it will work its way up, just like communism did; who got control of half the world at one time. People who got thinking rationally, and wise to communism and its propaganda of claims, and it eventually fell to obscurity. Truth always has a way of emerging victorious in the end. In the same light, Allah claims in numerous verses that all Jewish prophets are believers in Islam and ‘confirms’ these Jewish prophets to be ‘Muslims’. But the problem here is that Allah did not say in his Quran, who all these Jewish prophets were, to inform his believers who are in the dark now. There is no complete list of these Jewish prophets, in the Quran; leave alone proof of them being ‘Muslims’; and that too even before the Quran was invented? Are those Jewish prophets who are not mentioned in the Quran, (but mentioned in the Jewish/Christian scriptures) part of Allah’s Scripture or not? And how did these Jewish prophets know about Allah/Islam, when the Quran did not exist yet (which was invented only after (at least) 786 A.D. 154 years after Muhammad was poisoned to death in 632 A.D.; (see “The Invention of Islam”)? Whereas, Jesus was recorded by the Apostles who lived with him (and the Quran/Allah have the cheek to claim the bible is corrupted). There is not a single acceptable historical record of any Jewish Prophet having been a Muslim. Just claiming does not make them ‘Muslims’, does it? Of all the people, Jews/Jewish prophets really accepting Islam? Jews are laughing at these claims, and wondering why Muslims are making claims on Jews (like Abraham, Noah, etc), which even astounds Christians. The Jews are so passionate of their Jewishness that the majority of Jews did not even accept Jesus, a Jew; just because Jesus removed the barbaric Jewish beliefs of the previous era and made it obsolete, which the Muslims have blindly copied and are following, even today. Would the Jews accept Muhammad, an Arab, or any Arab for that matter? It’s not even remotely possible, right? Because of all these, it is a fact that Allah/Quran is lying and Islam is a fake.
Allah claims in Sura 3:50 that he revealed the Torah and in Sura 5:48 Allah claims he revealed the Gospel and the Torah. So was Allah revealing to Jesus the Gospel - about his trial in front of Pontius Pilate, whispering in Jesus’ ears of all the happenings around the fourteen Stations of the Cross, about Jesus’ shout to God, the torn temple curtain, the earthquake, the breaking open of graves, the Roman army officer’s response, about the Romans fleeing; and foretelling Jesus in ‘detailed whispers’ of all the numerous events to follow, while Jesus was bleeding in agony? These are all part and parcel of the Gospel. So did Allah reveal this entire Gospel to Jesus as Allah claims? It does sound absurd, ridiculous and plain stupid, doesn’t it? Allah further claims All Jewish/Christian Scriptures came from him, but he mentioned only the Torah and the Gospel in the Quran. The problem here is that the Torah is only 5 out of the thirty-nine books – just 12.8% of the total Jewish Scripture (Judaism counts them as 24 books only, because they join some together in the Tanakh). For the Bible, Allah mentioned just an Injil (Gospel). But there are four Injil (Gospels). In Sura 5:46 Allah clearly claims he revealed the Gospel (Not in the plural form) to Jesus. So which Injil (Gospel) did he refer to? Because the Quran says baby Jesus talked in his cradle, from this, we can assume it was the Gospel of Luke, since only Luke’s gospel described the birth of Christ. But there is a problem here, because less than 10% of this very Gospel is in the Quran. (But the Allah’s ridiculous tale of baby Jesus talking in his cradle – is a laughable joke to Christians?) Even if we take one whole Gospel, from a total of 66 books – it is just 1.5% of the Bible only. The Torah is NOT the Jewish Scripture, but just a very small part; and the Gospel of Luke is NOT the Christian Scripture, but just a tiny part of it. And this Allah has the cheek to claim ALL scriptures of Judaism and Christianity to be in his Quran - Where? (Is it in invisible ink, because I don’t see it in the Quran?) It is no wonder that so little of the Torah and the Gospel of Luke are mentioned in the Quran leaving out most of the prophets from the Bible and that too inaccurately. The Quran is relatively a small scripture book; that one will need three Qurans to transfer everything from one Jewish scripture; leave alone the Bible, which is even more voluminous. It is clear and obvious this Allah doesn’t know ALL the scriptures of Judaism and Christianity, which he falsely claims he revealed, but is obviously lying wholesale, to ignorant Muslims. It is also obvious that only some parts of the Torah and Gospel of Luke were plagiarized/copied. How did Jewish prophets become Muslims in pre-Islamic times and that too before the Quran was invented is a ridiculous claim? If this Allah is God, shouldn’t he have known all this? So, isn’t this Allah not a God – but a fake; a non-existent creation of Muhammad? Since Allah is a fake, doesn’t it confirm that Islam is a fake?
In Islamic Sects, a religious structure does not exist or even specified anywhere in the Quran, Hadiths or Sunna. Unlike Christian Sects, who all have a proper structural hierarchy with leaders/representatives? But in Islam, the Sunni sect, has no leader for all Sunni followers or the Shia (Shiite) for all their followers, and so forth. Why did Allah leave this state of chaos in Islam? Couldn’t he have anticipated or foretold that Muslims will end up killing (even in mosques) each other from different sects, like it is happening now in Indonesia, Bangla Desh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, etc. Why did Allah fail to see this happening? Even if Allah failed, why couldn’t and do not Muslims themselves get together to have a leader/representative? A Sunni Muslim cannot even lead/represent/talk for all Sunnis. Why cann’t Muslims solve this problem, even today? Let me tell you why – because Islam is a fake.
Arabs in front of the Kaaba in Mecca, were initially facing it for all prayers in pre-Islamic times. Arabs beyond did not have to, as per the Hindu practice of respect. (As for facing the Kaaba - the Hindus always show respect in facing their respected/venerated as it was in pre-Islamic times). Then comes Allah demanding ALL Muslims to face only Jerusalem instead, for all Muslim prayers (as in Sura 2:142-145). Hundreds of years later, Allah changed his mind and demanded all Muslims to face only the Kaaba to pray, all over again, when the Quran was finally invented. During the time the Muslims were facing Jerusalem, the Muslims in between these two cities were showing their backsides to the Kaaba. Why did Muslims disrespect the Kaaba in this way on Allah’s orders? Was Allah’s first command wrong? Why was this Allah so fickle minded? Why should All worldwide Muslims, face the Kaaba to pray in the first place? Or for that matter if God is everywhere, why face only in one direction to pray? Is Allah squatting only in the Kaaba? How did this come about? From pre-Islamic rituals - In Hinduism it is disrespectful not to face someone/something in holiness or to a person in high regard, like a king, parents, grandparents, etc when in communication (See “the Invention of Islam”). Thus, Hindus who are in front, face them in respect, - never the back towards them. See next item.
In sura 15:19 Allah says that the Earth is flat (and not a sphere) “ the earth spread out (like a carpet)” and to drum this “scientific Islamic theory of a flat earth” into the believers (Muslims), it is also repeated in 20:53 as a bed, & 43:10 as a resting place, & 78:6 as an expanse, & 84:3 spread out, & 88:20 spread. As if that is not enough stupidity, Allah goes further and confirms in Sura 18:87 the sun sets everyday in a muddy spring water on the earth, and people living there. How one would get a huge sun to land on such a relatively tiny planet like earth, sends all logic out the window. The burning fires of the Sun (thousands of degrees centigrade) will set the whole earth into a ball of fire and disintegrate it in just a millisecond, even before it gets within 1 Million Kilometers of earth. Where this spherical world has “its setting-place”, defies all logic and is sheer stupidity by this Allah, or is it actually this Muhammad speaking that Sura, on his behalf? The sun being a ball of fire and cannot even come a little bit closer, does not seem to have dawned on this Allah YET, since the Quran is meant for all time, so technically, even now Allah thinks the earth is flat and the sun sets everyday on earth. This Allah thought he was cleverer than the Hindus and decided to be one up on them and made it compulsory for ALL the Muslims to face the Kaaba to pray (or was it this Muhammad, actually?). And why not, he thought; since he imagined the world is as flat as a carpet and a bed. But when the world is a sphere as it actually is, the Muslims have ended facing the outer space instead, due to this Allah’s stupidity, and it makes a mockery of all believers (Muslims) trying to strain their necks round the spherical world. This has become a comic of errors with Muslims straining everyday (5 times each day) to face the Kaaba and failing to do so. So isn’t Allah a fake, especially, if he ‘claims’ he created it? Or is it Muhammad and his cronies, who actually invented the Quran, who not only thought the earth is flat, but his other “Scientific Islamic theory” of the Sun revolving round the earth in sura 39:5 – how ‘scientific’ all this Allah’s Quranic knowledge sounds, especially to the nut-cases? With so many illogical and stupid verses in the Quran, I cannot imagine anyone saying that Islam is from a true God. In other words, Islam is a fake.
The Quran was at the least, a minimum of 154 years in the making, AFTER Muhammad died (In the maximum - it could have even been hundreds of years in the making –see the Invention of Islam). But what is known for sure; is that there were many people involved and coined verses; in the making of the Quran (Muhammad and his 700 companions, Muhammad’s wives, concubines, temporary wives, slaves, relatives, friends, scribes – (at least one was a Christian, who the Arabs accused of inventing the Quran for Muhammad), two caliphs, and Zayed Ibn Thabit who compiled, recompiled and re-recompiled, and edited and reedited and even withdrew the initially distributed Qurans under Abu Bakr, and had them burnt. Is it because Satan had a hand in the making of the Quran as admitted in Sura 22:52? How much is Satan’s part in this Quran is left to the One True God? Wasn’t Allah strong enough to thwart Satan’s work in the very first instance? All this is confirmed as proof, by none other than Allah himself, in his own words, in the Quran. In Sura 2.106 Allah clearly states [“Such of Our revelations as We abrogate (cancel)(Naskh) or cause to be forgotten, we bring (in place) one better or the like thereof. Knowest thou not that Allah is Able to do all things.”] Now if this Allah ‘is able to do all things’, then why didn’t this Allah get it right the very first time, (as the Christian Bible) instead of canceling and replacing lots of Sura? Why did this Allah write a sura and then replace it with a better sura? By replacing with a better sura, Allah is admitting all his initial sura were not ‘better’? And what does “cause to be forgotten” got to do with canceling and replacing some sura? As if this is not deceitful enough; Allah has to repeat this deceit in Sura 16:101 saying, [“And when we put a revelation in place of (another) revelation, - And Allah knoweth best what He revealeth – they say: Lo! Thou art but inventing. Most of them know not.”] So it is obvious from this Sura, that there were Arabs already saying this is a deceitful inventing, right? So even the Arab people of Muhammad’s time knew Islam is (artificially) being invented. If “Allah knoweth best” his words sure don’t show it by his own admissions? Even Allah doesn’t dismiss all of those Arabs who saw through this deceit, but says only “most of them”, he doesn’t say ‘all of them’, does he? That leaves Allah to admit to some of the Arabs, of his deceitful and fake Islam. Why did this Allah waste so much time writing, canceling, rewriting; writing, replacing, rewriting, - did this Allah have nothing else useful to do? Or is it not a ‘God’ who is admitting all this, but just an ordinary man, as this self-appointed prophet (with no witnesses to his prophetship) of Islam or is it all the other people who had a hand in the making of the Quran? I know why these admissions were made because; people knew the Quran was changed and corrupted from the initially distributed Qurans and some admission became necessary to justify its corruption and changes. So Islam confirms itself to be a fake by its own admissions. What more is there to say, except to agree with the Quran’s own admissions, that Islam is corrupted and changed, making it a fake.
As you already know in item 4, Allah claimed that it was he who revealed the Jewish and Christian Scriptures to the Jews/Christians. But, in Sura 2:159 Allah says, [“Those who hide the proofs and the Guidance which We had made it clear in the Scriptures: such are accursed of Allah and accursed of those who have the power to curse.”] Now there are a lot of questions here unanswered with this Sura. 1. Why did Allah want the scriptures he supposedly gave to the Jews/Christians? 2. If Allah was indeed a God, couldn’t he, by just flicking his fingers, taken the scriptures back? 3. Were the Jews and Christians so powerful to hide their scriptures from this Allah? 4. In the same tone, was Allah so weak in comparison with the Jews/Christians? 5. Since he claims, it is he who gave the Scriptures, isn’t there anything left of it, in his memory? 6. What kind of a God is this Allah, if the Jews and Christians can hide something from him? 7.Why is this Allah cursing the Jews/Christians for hiding their own scriptures? 8. If this Allah “made it clear” surely he should be able to reproduce it, instead of cursing. Or did he want it to plagiarize/copy in full into the Quran? So who is this powerless Allah? Is it this Muhammad himself who is saying all this? Whatever the answers, and whether it is Allah or Muhammad speaking, it surely, without a doubt, indicates that Islam is a fake. Probably, who ever was inventing this Quran, might not have been able to proceed properly without plagiarizing/copying from the Jews/Christians. Like in Sura 2:140, [“Or say ye that Abraham and Ismael, and Isaac, and Jacob, or the tribes were Jews and Christians? Do ye know best, or doth Allah? And who is more unjust than he who hideth a testimony, which he had received from Allah? Allah is not unaware of what ye do.”] Here again Allah/Muhammad is threatening the Jews and Christians for hiding their own testimony (Scriptures)(Hiding scripture also repeated in 3:187). Why do they need the scriptures if not to copy into the Quran? So by killing and wiping out the Jews and Christians in Saudi Arabia, there ended a situation, with no one with knowledge or possession of the Scriptures of the Jews and the Christians. So Muhammad’s savage misdeeds backfired on him for his new religion and he paid the price for it. But, think about it, the possibility would have been there, when Muhammad and his 700 companions raided innocent Jewish and Christian Villages and robbed their properties, there could have been the Jewish and Christian Scriptures among them. Can you imagine what would have happened if they did manage to copy/plagiarize everything into the Quran (other than the Quran being bloated 10 times in volume). It is very unlikely, that the more than 150,000 Jews and Christians living in Saudi Arabia before Muhammad, would not have had their scriptures with them. The irony is that none of Muhammad and his companions could read or write – So even seeing them, would not have known, that what they were looking for all along, was destroyed by their own hands by the spirit of our Lord’s intervention, so burying Islam as a fake cult to the stupidity it contains, today.
The Muslims are quick to condemn the Jewish and Christian scriptures as changed and corrupted. This theory has been laughed at, mocked, made fun of, scorned and condemned in the Maddrassahs by Muslims for Muslims. But when one questions a Muslim clergy what part or the specifics of the corruption, they suddenly fall into a trance and become instantly dumb. Their clergy, to cover up the mistakes/contradictions and stupidities in the Quran, tell almost all Muslims this theory in their Islamic education from childhood and repeated and repeated over and over again. This is to keep the Muslims from giving up Islam, if they knew the truth of the Quran being changed and corrupted. The best way of defense is to go on the offensive, right? To cover up the Quran’s corruption, what better way, to lie and condemn the others in defense of their Allah? So the Muslims shamelessly perpetuate this lie, time after time with no proof of any Jewish and Christian Scripture’s corruption. The Quran states in Sura 10:64-65, [“Those who believe and keep their duty (to Allah). Theirs are good tidings in the life of the world and in the Hereafter – There is no changing in the words of Allah (in the Quran) – That is the supreme Triumph.”] No changing in the words of Allah? Lets look at another verse; in Sura 6:34, [“… There is none to alter the decisions of Allah.”] Allah goes further and commands Muhammad in Sura 10:95, [“And is thou (Muhammad) art in doubt concerning that which We reveal unto thee, then question those (Christians) who read the scripture (that was) before thee (Bible). So be not thou of the waverers.”] >From this Sura we can see that Allah is asking Muhammad to ask Christians, whenever, he is in doubt about the Quran. So here you have a so-called ‘prophet’ who is told by a so-called God, to learn from ordinary Christians, to clear his doubts. So what kind of a ‘prophet’ is this Muhammad, when even Allah wants him to seek the Christians’ help for Islam? Now we come to the coup de grace for the faux pas. In the Arabic Quran, Sura 27:91, reads [“I am commanded only to serve the Lord of this land which he had Hallowed, and unto him all things belong. And I am commanded to be of those who surrender.”] Now if all the words in the Quran are from Allah, then ‘I’ refers to Allah. So the Question is, who has commanded Allah according to this sura? And is this Allah serving a Lord? If this Sura is true, then Allah is not God, because a True God does not have to serve anyone, right? Why then is the Quran declaring Allah is not a God? Obviously, this proves Allah is a fake, which makes the Quran/Islam a fake. I must also point out that the most recognized English translation (recognized by the OIC) is the M.M. Pickthall Quran. He must have been horrified to recognize this corruption in the Quran and he cleverly tried to cover this up, by adding the word ‘Say’ as though Allah is telling Muhammad to say and Muhammad’s name in brackets, to imply as though, “(Say): I (Muhammad) am commanded only to serve the Lord…” But M.M. Pickthall was not clever enough for his deceit to cover up for Allah. Because if it is Muhammad speaking, then it would contradict Sura 10:65 and Sura 6:34 as mentioned above; wherein Allah says his words in the Quran cannot be changed. And in Sura 10:39 [“Or say they: He hath invented it? Say: then bring a surah like unto it, and call on all ye can beside Allah, if ye are truthful.”] This Sura confirms that only Allah speaks in the Quran. For the skeptics, let me give another example as in 19:64, [“We come not down save by commandment of thy Lord. Unto him belongeth all that is before us and all that is behind us and all that is between those two, and thy Lord was never forgetful – “]. M.M. Pickthall solved this problem in the Quran by deceitfully adding the word ‘angels’ in brackets, thus; [“We (angels) come not down save by commandment of thy Lord…”] But the problem is that it is confirming the Angels are the ones speaking in the Quran, right? This completely changed the connotation/dynamics of this Sura. The question here needs answering, is the Quran only the words of Allah, or is it a free for all, to state their views? As there are a number of Angels, Muhammad, Allah, etc speaking in the Quran, right? Or if Allah was the speaker of these Sura, then it is wrong, as he is not the God he claimed to be. If someone else is speaking these Sura, it is also wrong, because then the words in the Quran are not ONLY from Allah, as claimed by the Quran. It is a catch-22 situation, where the Muslim scholars cannot deny neither solve. The Muslims are themselves, trapped with so many of such sura in the Quran. Either way or whichever way, one interprets these Sura; the fact remains THE QURAN IS CORRUPTED/CHANGED, AND SO IS ISLAM/ALLAH A FAKE. This is an undeniable truth. These numerous deceits in Islam, especially when perpetrated on its own believers (Muslims) are despicable, false, wicked, shameful, disgraceful and plain EVIL. All these prove without a doubt, ISLAM IS CORRUPTED AND A FAKE. I rest my case.
Saturday, 15 October 2011
THE CHARACTER OF TYRANTS.
THE CHARACTER OF TYRANTS.
Similarities between Hitler, Muhammad and Stalin
By Ahmed Simon
Did you know the similarities between Hitler, Muhammad and Stalin?
But first, before we go into the similarities, let me take you through life, to show you where things, in all probabilities, could have gone wrong in human behavior.
Human beings are the only ‘species’, which are not born with life instincts and are nurtured into what they become in adulthood. A calf, soon after birth, in just a matter of minutes, starts running around its mother and instinctly knows where to suckle for its milk, and is equipped to flee in the face of danger. A human toddler is not equipped with such capabilities and knows only to wail and scream leaving the adults to guess what is wrong or sought after. A cub, when its adults disappear hunting, will instinctly know when to run and hide, in the face of approaching danger. A human child is totally dependant, on the mercy of other humans, at this stage in its life. A human is almost entirely influenced/dependant on his environment, almost entirely on the parents. So, physical and emotional growth of all newborn humans, also largely depend on the parents. Children use their parents as roll-models. The Bible aptly emphasizes all this, in its various books.
We know, much of how human adults behave, as the result of our guidance and discipline in our nurturing years by our parents. Parents also largely influence the emotional development of a child with love and care. If the first ten years of a child’s life is nurtured well and is healthy, the chances are excellent for a successful adolescent life as a teenager.
But in these first two decades of life, until around 18 years of life, many emotional aspects can change the situation drastically and send the child into an unexpected tailspin into a conflicting direction. A sudden demise of a parent is an example. The loss of a parent is traumatic to any child/teenager. To a child/teenager this is never comprehensible and fully understood. At times, professional help is sought to reduce the trauma and help in the continued emotional development. The missed nurturing could never be replaced in its entirety at a later stage in life. As the phrase, “Time and tide will wait for no man” has a deep and enduring meaning here.
All said and done, research records/facts also show that a wayward person can generally, be traced back to his parents. Research also shows that most confirmed criminals come from broken homes. Thus, we can assume that nurturing in our first two decades is paramount to an adult’s later life. Nurturing sets the direction, for the rest of our lives. But, admitted, there are always exceptions to the rule, as other forces can play a part to offset this balancing rule.
Now for the character in the lives of Hitler, Muhammad and Stalin: -
All their fathers died when they were young (Muhammad’s father died before his birth – poor fellow. He never got to see his father).
All their mothers died early. (Muhammad’s mother died the earliest, when he was only 4 years old. Here again Muhammad seems to have lost the most among the three. Later, his grandfather who adopted him died and then again his uncle who adopted him also died, adding even more misery to little Muhammad. Recap - Father, then mother, then grandfather, then uncle – one could not have been so unfortunate or cursed. Perhaps, it is because he had no chance of receiving love that he could not give true love and compassion).
All three had a very miserable childhood.
All three had a very miserable youth. (Stalin and Hitler had abusive fathers who also abused their mothers. I have no record of Muhammad’s father’s behavior towards his mother, but it is highly likely that he was abusive with her too, given the Arabic tradition of beating the crap out of their wives and Sura 4:34 not just to beat their wives, but to scourge – whip them as camels/animals.)
All three came from not well-to-do families. (Muhammad worked for his rich elderly first wife [who was previously widowed) and only after she died, did he inherit all her wealth and become rich and powerful – a calculated move?).
All three did not have a wholesome good education (Here again, Muhammad was the worst of the lot, because he was never even educated and could not read or write – a complete illiterate).
All three struggled in life through youth.
All three dabbled with religion some time in their lives
All three were rejected in religion during their lifetime.
All three were abusive to women.
All three were arrogant and never accepted the truth.
All three never admitted to their wrong/mistakes, even when clear evidence was staring at their faces.
All three thought of women as lacking in intelligence.
All three had ridiculous and absurd relationships with women.
All three were not compassionate with Children.
All three contemplated suicide, at least once.
All three used their barbaric and savage side in life, whenever it suited them.
All three were selfish, ruthless and illogical.
All three used many other men to carry out their evil deeds.
All three lied through their noses.
All three were very extraordinarily vicious-minded.
All three were very cunning and used force as a means to achieve what they wanted.
All three were untrustworthy. They broke the very peace agreements they signed. (It goes to show that you cannot believe ill-nurtured people, no matter what they say or do. Their word could be as elastic as they want it to be. In other words, they were all without principles.)
All three had no respect, for human lives or had humane values.
All three were very vengeful, even till the end of their lives.
All three were never remorseful even till the end.
All three have no history of great compassion.
All three were self-centred and egotistic.
All three commanded huge forces of men.
All three abused their powers and sent fear around them.
All three stole from others.
All three generally, had no human conscience.
All three had sexual affairs with women, who were not married to them (adulterers - here too, Muhammad comes out top among the three).
All three unashamedly enjoyed/benefited from the labour of others.
All three were always fearful and suspicious of those close to them and even towards their own supporters and associates.
All three of them borrowed from past history, to justify their actions.
All three rose up in life through cruel and inhumane ways.
All three had become tyrants when in power and had ‘others’ human blood in their hands’.
All three had those close to them, killed.
All three were racists in the very extreme.
All three hated Jews and had them killed in large numbers.
All three sent their countries into turmoil and war.
All three had many innocent men, women and children killed.
All three claimed that they were destined for greatness, but actually ended up being notorious for their misdeeds.
All three died miserable and painful deaths. (Here too Muhammad comes up ‘outstanding’ to have suffered his last excruciating painful existence for 2 ½ years. The other two were quick deaths, but not without mental torture in their last days of lives. Out of the three, only Stalin has a grave in his name.)
All three life histories turn one’s stomach with revulsion and are sickening to any civilised human being, to even imagine their inhuman lives.
All three died remembering women. (A. Muhammad was poisoned to death by a woman and died on the lap of his wife, Aisha. B. Hitler and Stalin died with photographs of their mothers in their wallets.) Imagine the irony of it all.
All three ended their lives unexpectedly. (Did God intervene to put an end to them, from committing further crimes against humanity?)
All three are of the worst example of a human being, who ever walked this earth.
All three are remembered forever, for their despicable, dastardly, inhuman, barbaric, savage and cruel misdeeds.
From these facts, one can see the similarities in the characters and behaviors, of the three, namely Hitler, Muhammad and Stalin. All three had almost non-existent parental nurturing. All three were ABSOLUTE EVIL. The similarities among them are a stark paradox to their claims.
History will forever keep warning the world of such barbaric and inhuman savages, who ever walked this earth. History will also remind this civilised world of the lessons learnt from the past, so that history will not repeat itself.
Dear Readers, please send this article to as many people as you can, so that they will be informed. Thank you
Similarities between Hitler, Muhammad and Stalin
By Ahmed Simon
Did you know the similarities between Hitler, Muhammad and Stalin?
But first, before we go into the similarities, let me take you through life, to show you where things, in all probabilities, could have gone wrong in human behavior.
Human beings are the only ‘species’, which are not born with life instincts and are nurtured into what they become in adulthood. A calf, soon after birth, in just a matter of minutes, starts running around its mother and instinctly knows where to suckle for its milk, and is equipped to flee in the face of danger. A human toddler is not equipped with such capabilities and knows only to wail and scream leaving the adults to guess what is wrong or sought after. A cub, when its adults disappear hunting, will instinctly know when to run and hide, in the face of approaching danger. A human child is totally dependant, on the mercy of other humans, at this stage in its life. A human is almost entirely influenced/dependant on his environment, almost entirely on the parents. So, physical and emotional growth of all newborn humans, also largely depend on the parents. Children use their parents as roll-models. The Bible aptly emphasizes all this, in its various books.
We know, much of how human adults behave, as the result of our guidance and discipline in our nurturing years by our parents. Parents also largely influence the emotional development of a child with love and care. If the first ten years of a child’s life is nurtured well and is healthy, the chances are excellent for a successful adolescent life as a teenager.
But in these first two decades of life, until around 18 years of life, many emotional aspects can change the situation drastically and send the child into an unexpected tailspin into a conflicting direction. A sudden demise of a parent is an example. The loss of a parent is traumatic to any child/teenager. To a child/teenager this is never comprehensible and fully understood. At times, professional help is sought to reduce the trauma and help in the continued emotional development. The missed nurturing could never be replaced in its entirety at a later stage in life. As the phrase, “Time and tide will wait for no man” has a deep and enduring meaning here.
All said and done, research records/facts also show that a wayward person can generally, be traced back to his parents. Research also shows that most confirmed criminals come from broken homes. Thus, we can assume that nurturing in our first two decades is paramount to an adult’s later life. Nurturing sets the direction, for the rest of our lives. But, admitted, there are always exceptions to the rule, as other forces can play a part to offset this balancing rule.
Now for the character in the lives of Hitler, Muhammad and Stalin: -
All their fathers died when they were young (Muhammad’s father died before his birth – poor fellow. He never got to see his father).
All their mothers died early. (Muhammad’s mother died the earliest, when he was only 4 years old. Here again Muhammad seems to have lost the most among the three. Later, his grandfather who adopted him died and then again his uncle who adopted him also died, adding even more misery to little Muhammad. Recap - Father, then mother, then grandfather, then uncle – one could not have been so unfortunate or cursed. Perhaps, it is because he had no chance of receiving love that he could not give true love and compassion).
All three had a very miserable childhood.
All three had a very miserable youth. (Stalin and Hitler had abusive fathers who also abused their mothers. I have no record of Muhammad’s father’s behavior towards his mother, but it is highly likely that he was abusive with her too, given the Arabic tradition of beating the crap out of their wives and Sura 4:34 not just to beat their wives, but to scourge – whip them as camels/animals.)
All three came from not well-to-do families. (Muhammad worked for his rich elderly first wife [who was previously widowed) and only after she died, did he inherit all her wealth and become rich and powerful – a calculated move?).
All three did not have a wholesome good education (Here again, Muhammad was the worst of the lot, because he was never even educated and could not read or write – a complete illiterate).
All three struggled in life through youth.
All three dabbled with religion some time in their lives
All three were rejected in religion during their lifetime.
All three were abusive to women.
All three were arrogant and never accepted the truth.
All three never admitted to their wrong/mistakes, even when clear evidence was staring at their faces.
All three thought of women as lacking in intelligence.
All three had ridiculous and absurd relationships with women.
All three were not compassionate with Children.
All three contemplated suicide, at least once.
All three used their barbaric and savage side in life, whenever it suited them.
All three were selfish, ruthless and illogical.
All three used many other men to carry out their evil deeds.
All three lied through their noses.
All three were very extraordinarily vicious-minded.
All three were very cunning and used force as a means to achieve what they wanted.
All three were untrustworthy. They broke the very peace agreements they signed. (It goes to show that you cannot believe ill-nurtured people, no matter what they say or do. Their word could be as elastic as they want it to be. In other words, they were all without principles.)
All three had no respect, for human lives or had humane values.
All three were very vengeful, even till the end of their lives.
All three were never remorseful even till the end.
All three have no history of great compassion.
All three were self-centred and egotistic.
All three commanded huge forces of men.
All three abused their powers and sent fear around them.
All three stole from others.
All three generally, had no human conscience.
All three had sexual affairs with women, who were not married to them (adulterers - here too, Muhammad comes out top among the three).
All three unashamedly enjoyed/benefited from the labour of others.
All three were always fearful and suspicious of those close to them and even towards their own supporters and associates.
All three of them borrowed from past history, to justify their actions.
All three rose up in life through cruel and inhumane ways.
All three had become tyrants when in power and had ‘others’ human blood in their hands’.
All three had those close to them, killed.
All three were racists in the very extreme.
All three hated Jews and had them killed in large numbers.
All three sent their countries into turmoil and war.
All three had many innocent men, women and children killed.
All three claimed that they were destined for greatness, but actually ended up being notorious for their misdeeds.
All three died miserable and painful deaths. (Here too Muhammad comes up ‘outstanding’ to have suffered his last excruciating painful existence for 2 ½ years. The other two were quick deaths, but not without mental torture in their last days of lives. Out of the three, only Stalin has a grave in his name.)
All three life histories turn one’s stomach with revulsion and are sickening to any civilised human being, to even imagine their inhuman lives.
All three died remembering women. (A. Muhammad was poisoned to death by a woman and died on the lap of his wife, Aisha. B. Hitler and Stalin died with photographs of their mothers in their wallets.) Imagine the irony of it all.
All three ended their lives unexpectedly. (Did God intervene to put an end to them, from committing further crimes against humanity?)
All three are of the worst example of a human being, who ever walked this earth.
All three are remembered forever, for their despicable, dastardly, inhuman, barbaric, savage and cruel misdeeds.
From these facts, one can see the similarities in the characters and behaviors, of the three, namely Hitler, Muhammad and Stalin. All three had almost non-existent parental nurturing. All three were ABSOLUTE EVIL. The similarities among them are a stark paradox to their claims.
History will forever keep warning the world of such barbaric and inhuman savages, who ever walked this earth. History will also remind this civilised world of the lessons learnt from the past, so that history will not repeat itself.
Dear Readers, please send this article to as many people as you can, so that they will be informed. Thank you
ISLAMIC SHARIA LAW
ISLAMIC SHARIA LAW
There are four main ‘schools of thought’ in the application of the Islamic Sharia laws. These laws gradually sprouted out and is amended and changed even today, from country to country, and state to state, but always basing on the 7th century model of Jurisprudence. The biggest drawback is that Islamic Sharia Laws do not permit ‘Circumstantial Evidence’, but recognizes only eyewitness accounts to a misdemeanor/crime. It is well known in Islamic Sharia law applications, that people, who want to settle scores with someone, do give false eyewitness accounts. Records show that girls/women are the worse adversely affected. For an example, if a girl is raped, she should produce a minimum of 2 or 4 eyewitnesses of reputable character (depending on the Sharia applied) to convict the rapist. If there is only one eyewitness, the rapist is set free to rape again. It doesn’t end there. If this girl gets pregnant from this rape, she is condemned to be stoned to death, for adultery (getting pregnant out of wedlock). In a democratic and modern society, it is well documented that 92% of criminal convictions are obtained not by eyewitness accounts but by ‘circumstantial evidence’ and application of science (like DNA, etc), which are all disallowed in Islam. The Sharia laws are also in contravention of the United Nations Convention on Human Rights. Can you imagine living in a society with rapists, murderers, sex-maniacs, etc running around as free as a bird, because of Islam?
CONCLUSION
The uneducated women of the 7th century, who are the main sources of the Quran, are known for their physical and sexual prowess, rather than their intelligence. The backward mentality of these sources is reflected in Islam. Thus, Islam is regressive and leads to decay. This is manifested in every Muslim society. Muslim societies are the most violent, dangerous, lawless, unprogressive, undeveloped, disorderly, plagued with diseases, disasters and thus Muslims unashamedly flee Islamic societies to non-Islamic countries. By this migration, Muslims prove that Islam is evil, regressive and inhuman. Thus, millions of Muslims today, give up Islam, even though the trap in Islam is so physically a cold-blooded entrapment, (to kill apostates); retaining only those less intelligent or forced to remain in Islam out of the ignorance, birth or Islamic pressure. Even reputed Islamic religious, of authoritative standing and powers that may be, are very worried of the rapid pace of Islam’s demise manifesting itself in every direction. The pressure on the UN to ban the barbaric Quran is mounting day by day. It is evident without a doubt that Islam is a fake invention. The demise of this manmade Islam is undeniable and evident even to the less intelligent.
There are four main ‘schools of thought’ in the application of the Islamic Sharia laws. These laws gradually sprouted out and is amended and changed even today, from country to country, and state to state, but always basing on the 7th century model of Jurisprudence. The biggest drawback is that Islamic Sharia Laws do not permit ‘Circumstantial Evidence’, but recognizes only eyewitness accounts to a misdemeanor/crime. It is well known in Islamic Sharia law applications, that people, who want to settle scores with someone, do give false eyewitness accounts. Records show that girls/women are the worse adversely affected. For an example, if a girl is raped, she should produce a minimum of 2 or 4 eyewitnesses of reputable character (depending on the Sharia applied) to convict the rapist. If there is only one eyewitness, the rapist is set free to rape again. It doesn’t end there. If this girl gets pregnant from this rape, she is condemned to be stoned to death, for adultery (getting pregnant out of wedlock). In a democratic and modern society, it is well documented that 92% of criminal convictions are obtained not by eyewitness accounts but by ‘circumstantial evidence’ and application of science (like DNA, etc), which are all disallowed in Islam. The Sharia laws are also in contravention of the United Nations Convention on Human Rights. Can you imagine living in a society with rapists, murderers, sex-maniacs, etc running around as free as a bird, because of Islam?
CONCLUSION
The uneducated women of the 7th century, who are the main sources of the Quran, are known for their physical and sexual prowess, rather than their intelligence. The backward mentality of these sources is reflected in Islam. Thus, Islam is regressive and leads to decay. This is manifested in every Muslim society. Muslim societies are the most violent, dangerous, lawless, unprogressive, undeveloped, disorderly, plagued with diseases, disasters and thus Muslims unashamedly flee Islamic societies to non-Islamic countries. By this migration, Muslims prove that Islam is evil, regressive and inhuman. Thus, millions of Muslims today, give up Islam, even though the trap in Islam is so physically a cold-blooded entrapment, (to kill apostates); retaining only those less intelligent or forced to remain in Islam out of the ignorance, birth or Islamic pressure. Even reputed Islamic religious, of authoritative standing and powers that may be, are very worried of the rapid pace of Islam’s demise manifesting itself in every direction. The pressure on the UN to ban the barbaric Quran is mounting day by day. It is evident without a doubt that Islam is a fake invention. The demise of this manmade Islam is undeniable and evident even to the less intelligent.
HADITH AND SUNNAH
HADITH AND SUNNAH
Because of the limitations of the Quran’s open-ended verses of generalization/absurdities/etc, it led to various interpretations and thus explanations were required of the biographical accounts of the sayings, customs and actions of Muhammad and his companions, to better understand the Quran – this is called the Hadith, and also considered sacred, but second to the Quran. Numerous writers produced various Hadiths over 600 years (from around 800 A.D. to 1,400 A.D.), and it created even more confusions, contradictions and distortions over the different schools of thought (Madhab) by the various writers, as almost all never even knew Muhammad personally.
The Sunnah is the ‘Path’ or ‘Way’ (it implies the doings and practices of Muhammad), and is also considered sacred, but third in rank. Here too, the vast differences between various writers are causing untold numerous problems, leading to chaos.
Depending on the Islamic sect and the various Hadith and Sunnah they choose to comply; the differences among Muslims are so great that the killings between Islamic sects is continuing to this day in Pakistan, Indonesia, Algeria, Afghanistan and the Middle East.
Because of the limitations of the Quran’s open-ended verses of generalization/absurdities/etc, it led to various interpretations and thus explanations were required of the biographical accounts of the sayings, customs and actions of Muhammad and his companions, to better understand the Quran – this is called the Hadith, and also considered sacred, but second to the Quran. Numerous writers produced various Hadiths over 600 years (from around 800 A.D. to 1,400 A.D.), and it created even more confusions, contradictions and distortions over the different schools of thought (Madhab) by the various writers, as almost all never even knew Muhammad personally.
The Sunnah is the ‘Path’ or ‘Way’ (it implies the doings and practices of Muhammad), and is also considered sacred, but third in rank. Here too, the vast differences between various writers are causing untold numerous problems, leading to chaos.
Depending on the Islamic sect and the various Hadith and Sunnah they choose to comply; the differences among Muslims are so great that the killings between Islamic sects is continuing to this day in Pakistan, Indonesia, Algeria, Afghanistan and the Middle East.
THE CONTENTS OF THE QURAN
THE CONTENTS OF THE QURAN
The chapters of the Quran are not arranged in importance, continuity, biography, chronology, significance or sequence of any sort, but are arranged by length - the longest chapter first and the last chapter with just 6 lines. Verses are disorderly arranged and jumbled up in unrelated subjects/topics. Christians will be horrified to know that there is no prophecy, no chronology, no geography, no biography of anybody (not even Muhammad), no ministry, no history, no proverbs, no parables, no miracles, no psalms, generally, just do’s and don’t, like an instruction manual of a washing machine; and with punitive punishments, reprisals and rewards specified.
For example, for do’s, all Muslims are to slay (kill) non-Muslims as in Sura 4:74, 9:5 and 9:29. For punishments, Sura 4:34 commands husbands to scourge (whip) his wife/s who are disobedient to him and abandon her/them till she/they submit to him. For non-Muslim ‘rewards’, Sura 2:191 commands “Slay them (non-Muslims)…Such is the reward of those who suppress faith (Islam)”. Muslims are also commanded to carry out Sura 8.12 which demands, “I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore, smite them in the necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes”. There are numerous such ‘evil rewards’ specified for non-Muslims. For Muslim rewards, are those who fight and die for Allah in Sura 52:17-20; 55:56-58; 55:70-74 and 56:37-38, which reward suicides with best fruits, rivers of vine, and 72 voluptuous fair virgin ladies in Heaven. There are even rewards for homosexual Muslims, “boys as fresh as pearls”, as in Sura 52:20-24. The Quran also forbids all Muslims, the freedom “to think and act as they see fit, because the thinking is already done by Allah and his Messenger”, as in Sura 33:36 (in other words, independent thinking is not allowed in Islam). This is impressed upon Muslims, from their childhood nurturing in Maddrassahs and thus, explains why Muslims are terrified to go against their Quran. Questioning the logic of the Quran is considered blasphemous in Islam.
The Quranic verses are meant for reciting only, in a rhythm and do not require understanding the meaning, from this old Arabic script. Thus, most Muslims do not understand and question the Quran they read, in total blind faith. Differences in the Qurans today create more problems, and pilgrims who land in Mecca for their pilgrimages, will be searched and their Quran, if found to be different from the Wahabi sect’s Quran, will be confiscated and burnt
The chapters of the Quran are not arranged in importance, continuity, biography, chronology, significance or sequence of any sort, but are arranged by length - the longest chapter first and the last chapter with just 6 lines. Verses are disorderly arranged and jumbled up in unrelated subjects/topics. Christians will be horrified to know that there is no prophecy, no chronology, no geography, no biography of anybody (not even Muhammad), no ministry, no history, no proverbs, no parables, no miracles, no psalms, generally, just do’s and don’t, like an instruction manual of a washing machine; and with punitive punishments, reprisals and rewards specified.
For example, for do’s, all Muslims are to slay (kill) non-Muslims as in Sura 4:74, 9:5 and 9:29. For punishments, Sura 4:34 commands husbands to scourge (whip) his wife/s who are disobedient to him and abandon her/them till she/they submit to him. For non-Muslim ‘rewards’, Sura 2:191 commands “Slay them (non-Muslims)…Such is the reward of those who suppress faith (Islam)”. Muslims are also commanded to carry out Sura 8.12 which demands, “I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore, smite them in the necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes”. There are numerous such ‘evil rewards’ specified for non-Muslims. For Muslim rewards, are those who fight and die for Allah in Sura 52:17-20; 55:56-58; 55:70-74 and 56:37-38, which reward suicides with best fruits, rivers of vine, and 72 voluptuous fair virgin ladies in Heaven. There are even rewards for homosexual Muslims, “boys as fresh as pearls”, as in Sura 52:20-24. The Quran also forbids all Muslims, the freedom “to think and act as they see fit, because the thinking is already done by Allah and his Messenger”, as in Sura 33:36 (in other words, independent thinking is not allowed in Islam). This is impressed upon Muslims, from their childhood nurturing in Maddrassahs and thus, explains why Muslims are terrified to go against their Quran. Questioning the logic of the Quran is considered blasphemous in Islam.
The Quranic verses are meant for reciting only, in a rhythm and do not require understanding the meaning, from this old Arabic script. Thus, most Muslims do not understand and question the Quran they read, in total blind faith. Differences in the Qurans today create more problems, and pilgrims who land in Mecca for their pilgrimages, will be searched and their Quran, if found to be different from the Wahabi sect’s Quran, will be confiscated and burnt
THE INVENTION OF THE QURAN
THE INVENTION OF THE QURAN
In these existing conditions, Muhammad started inventing his own religion after 610 A.D. when he appointed himself as Allah’s apostle and messenger, as stated in the Quran (not as a prophet) and claimed that the Angel Gabriel ordered him thus (without any witnesses to his claim). Muhammad gathered a concoction of about 10% of Babylonian Talmud (not the Torah of Judaism, but with numerous errors/etc); about 5% of Christianity (a few parts of the Gospel, but distorted and erroneous, probably gathered from Mary his Coptic slave, and Waraqa, his wife Khadija’s Christian cousin, and during his travels to Syria); about 25% of existing Hindu temples/Allah/idols/rituals and beliefs in Saudi Arabia. (The word ‘Allah’ is a Sanskrit word and in truth, there is no Islamic Allah); about 10% of Animism (spirits, demons, Jinns, devils, spirits, etc) gathered from existing Arab folklore and mythical tales; about 10% of Arabic traditions and culture, and 40% of Muhammad and his companions’ own barbaric creations, to make up Islam, his new religion. Since Muhammad and his several hundred companions were completely illiterate (could not read or write) and Muhammad had a poor memory; thus, his companions memorized for him the Quranic verses they plagiarized/concocted. But in the battle of Yamamah, almost all his companions were killed and the original Quranic verses were lost forever and was never compiled in writing before Muhammad himself was killed by food poisoning in 632 A.D. by a Jewish slave, who said, “If you are a true Apostle, Allah would have saved you”. Caliph Abu Bakr (632-634A.D.) then entrusted Zayed Ibn Thabit to compile the Quran, from memories of Muhammad’s illiterate wives, concubines, slaves, and a few contacts; who claimed to have heard Muhammad and his companions utter various verses. Zayed managed to gather an estimated 7,900 verses. But this first compilation of the Quran, with numerous contradictions, ridicule, confusions, and errors, created a lot of trouble and huge problems arose over the years. Under the caliphate of Uthman (644-656 A.D.), he was compelled to withdraw all the distributed, handwritten copies of the Qurans and burnt them. Zayed was again ordered for the second time, to recompile and re-edit the Quran more sensibly and convincingly from his original Quran, kept with Hafsa (Muhammad’s widow). Zayed did the best he could in re-editing the Quran and more than 2,000 contradictory, confusing, erroneous and illogical verses were abrogated (cancelled), some were replaced, and others added/borrowed to make sense of the cancellations/replacements. This re-edited Quran in Sura 16:101-103 says Arabs accused a Christian slave of teaching Muhammad and was persecuted, and 25:4-5 confirms accusations of borrowing stories from Folktales, and Fables by the then Arabs. Abu Al-Aswad Al Doaly put dots as syntactical marks, during the time of Mu'awiya Ibn Abi Sufian (661-680 A.D). The letters were marked with different dotting by Nasr Ibn Asem and Hayy ibn Ya'amor, during the time of Abd Al-Malek Ibn Marawan (685-705 A.D). A complete system of diacritical marks, (damma, fataha, kasra,), were newly created by Al Khaleel Ibn Ahmad Al Faraheedy (d. 786 A.D). Now the Quran stands at only 6,241 verses today from its original 7,900. But given the circumstances prevailing in those days and the fact that compiling from various uneducated peoples’ memories, etc; this concocted manmade Quran, still have a lot of contradictions, confusions, absurdities, illogicalities, ridicule, errors, unscientific theories, etc. (For details, see ‘A dialogue between a Christian and a Muslim about the Quran’ and ‘A balanced understanding of Islam’ in this website). So a lot of people did have a hand in inventing the Quran. Thus, the bulk of the verses of today’s Quran, are actually from Muhammad’s wives, concubines, temporary wives, slaves and was edited by Zayed Ibn Thabit (it has nothing to do with God).
In these existing conditions, Muhammad started inventing his own religion after 610 A.D. when he appointed himself as Allah’s apostle and messenger, as stated in the Quran (not as a prophet) and claimed that the Angel Gabriel ordered him thus (without any witnesses to his claim). Muhammad gathered a concoction of about 10% of Babylonian Talmud (not the Torah of Judaism, but with numerous errors/etc); about 5% of Christianity (a few parts of the Gospel, but distorted and erroneous, probably gathered from Mary his Coptic slave, and Waraqa, his wife Khadija’s Christian cousin, and during his travels to Syria); about 25% of existing Hindu temples/Allah/idols/rituals and beliefs in Saudi Arabia. (The word ‘Allah’ is a Sanskrit word and in truth, there is no Islamic Allah); about 10% of Animism (spirits, demons, Jinns, devils, spirits, etc) gathered from existing Arab folklore and mythical tales; about 10% of Arabic traditions and culture, and 40% of Muhammad and his companions’ own barbaric creations, to make up Islam, his new religion. Since Muhammad and his several hundred companions were completely illiterate (could not read or write) and Muhammad had a poor memory; thus, his companions memorized for him the Quranic verses they plagiarized/concocted. But in the battle of Yamamah, almost all his companions were killed and the original Quranic verses were lost forever and was never compiled in writing before Muhammad himself was killed by food poisoning in 632 A.D. by a Jewish slave, who said, “If you are a true Apostle, Allah would have saved you”. Caliph Abu Bakr (632-634A.D.) then entrusted Zayed Ibn Thabit to compile the Quran, from memories of Muhammad’s illiterate wives, concubines, slaves, and a few contacts; who claimed to have heard Muhammad and his companions utter various verses. Zayed managed to gather an estimated 7,900 verses. But this first compilation of the Quran, with numerous contradictions, ridicule, confusions, and errors, created a lot of trouble and huge problems arose over the years. Under the caliphate of Uthman (644-656 A.D.), he was compelled to withdraw all the distributed, handwritten copies of the Qurans and burnt them. Zayed was again ordered for the second time, to recompile and re-edit the Quran more sensibly and convincingly from his original Quran, kept with Hafsa (Muhammad’s widow). Zayed did the best he could in re-editing the Quran and more than 2,000 contradictory, confusing, erroneous and illogical verses were abrogated (cancelled), some were replaced, and others added/borrowed to make sense of the cancellations/replacements. This re-edited Quran in Sura 16:101-103 says Arabs accused a Christian slave of teaching Muhammad and was persecuted, and 25:4-5 confirms accusations of borrowing stories from Folktales, and Fables by the then Arabs. Abu Al-Aswad Al Doaly put dots as syntactical marks, during the time of Mu'awiya Ibn Abi Sufian (661-680 A.D). The letters were marked with different dotting by Nasr Ibn Asem and Hayy ibn Ya'amor, during the time of Abd Al-Malek Ibn Marawan (685-705 A.D). A complete system of diacritical marks, (damma, fataha, kasra,), were newly created by Al Khaleel Ibn Ahmad Al Faraheedy (d. 786 A.D). Now the Quran stands at only 6,241 verses today from its original 7,900. But given the circumstances prevailing in those days and the fact that compiling from various uneducated peoples’ memories, etc; this concocted manmade Quran, still have a lot of contradictions, confusions, absurdities, illogicalities, ridicule, errors, unscientific theories, etc. (For details, see ‘A dialogue between a Christian and a Muslim about the Quran’ and ‘A balanced understanding of Islam’ in this website). So a lot of people did have a hand in inventing the Quran. Thus, the bulk of the verses of today’s Quran, are actually from Muhammad’s wives, concubines, temporary wives, slaves and was edited by Zayed Ibn Thabit (it has nothing to do with God).
THE INVENTION OF ISLAM
THE INVENTION OF ISLAM
By AHMED SIMON
PRE-ISLAMIC ERA
History documents the Vikrama Era (58 B.C. to 415 A.D.) of the Maharaja/s Candragupta/s stretched their Hindu Empire from India right up to the whole of the Arabian Peninsula in the West. These Maharaja/s were greatly devoted to their Hindu Deities of Lord Siva (moon God-Allat) and his spouse, Goddess Durga (moon goddess-Allah). The Maharajas gave thanks to their Godly Deities by building temples in their honour, in all their territories (at least 7 in Saudi Arabia alone, including the present Kaaba). Even after their Empire fell, the Arabs faithfully devoted themselves to these Godly Deities/Temples up to Muhammad’s time. (For details – see ‘Kaaba a Hindu Temple’ in www.hinduism.co.za).
MUHAMMAD
Muhammad of the Qoraish tribe of Saudi Arabia was born in 571 A.D. but his father, Abdullah, died 4 months before he was born. Infant Muhammad and his widowed mother, Amina were looked after by her father, Abdul Mutalib. During this time, Halima, a Bedouin lady, nursed infant Muhammad. After a few weeks, she complained infant Muhammad was possessed by the devil and refused him. His mother Amina then died, when he was only 5 years old. When orphaned Muhammad was 8, his grandfather, Abdul Mutalib also died, and the boy Muhammad was passed on to his uncle, Abu Talib, who had a trading caravan business with Syria. At age 20, Abu Talib handed Muhammad over to work for Khadija, who had a thriving caravan business. At age 25, Muhammad married his boss, 40-year-old rich widow Khadija, and thereby became stepfather of Khadija’s two daughters from a previous marriage. Muhammad did not show ‘his true colours’ while he was married to Khadija. But after she died, Muhammad was ‘let loose’ with enormous wealth and went on to have 9 wives, dozens of concubines, numerous temporary wives, and over a hundred male/female slaves. He was also betrothed to 6-year-old Aisha, and married her at age 9 (8 by our calendar). He took to sexual fondness of his daughter-in-law when he saw her changing her clothes and married her – the initially wife of his adopted son, Zaid. Once when he was caught red-handed raping his wife (Sadiah’s) slave (Mary), out of wedlock, he reprimanded Sadiah for ‘making a big thing out of it.’ Muhammad and his companions frequently raided unsuspecting villages, (even those who had peace treaties with him) decapitating the men, and taking their wives, sons/daughters as slaves, ‘the best always for himself’ according to the Quran. In Sahih Bukhari’s Hadith, when some thieves were caught, Muhammad ordered his companions to dig out both eyes of each thief, and sent them away, blind and bleeding. Out of the 68 wars Muhammad and his companions fought, only one was defensive and the remaining 67 were offensive wars initiated by Muhammad and his companions
By AHMED SIMON
PRE-ISLAMIC ERA
History documents the Vikrama Era (58 B.C. to 415 A.D.) of the Maharaja/s Candragupta/s stretched their Hindu Empire from India right up to the whole of the Arabian Peninsula in the West. These Maharaja/s were greatly devoted to their Hindu Deities of Lord Siva (moon God-Allat) and his spouse, Goddess Durga (moon goddess-Allah). The Maharajas gave thanks to their Godly Deities by building temples in their honour, in all their territories (at least 7 in Saudi Arabia alone, including the present Kaaba). Even after their Empire fell, the Arabs faithfully devoted themselves to these Godly Deities/Temples up to Muhammad’s time. (For details – see ‘Kaaba a Hindu Temple’ in www.hinduism.co.za).
MUHAMMAD
Muhammad of the Qoraish tribe of Saudi Arabia was born in 571 A.D. but his father, Abdullah, died 4 months before he was born. Infant Muhammad and his widowed mother, Amina were looked after by her father, Abdul Mutalib. During this time, Halima, a Bedouin lady, nursed infant Muhammad. After a few weeks, she complained infant Muhammad was possessed by the devil and refused him. His mother Amina then died, when he was only 5 years old. When orphaned Muhammad was 8, his grandfather, Abdul Mutalib also died, and the boy Muhammad was passed on to his uncle, Abu Talib, who had a trading caravan business with Syria. At age 20, Abu Talib handed Muhammad over to work for Khadija, who had a thriving caravan business. At age 25, Muhammad married his boss, 40-year-old rich widow Khadija, and thereby became stepfather of Khadija’s two daughters from a previous marriage. Muhammad did not show ‘his true colours’ while he was married to Khadija. But after she died, Muhammad was ‘let loose’ with enormous wealth and went on to have 9 wives, dozens of concubines, numerous temporary wives, and over a hundred male/female slaves. He was also betrothed to 6-year-old Aisha, and married her at age 9 (8 by our calendar). He took to sexual fondness of his daughter-in-law when he saw her changing her clothes and married her – the initially wife of his adopted son, Zaid. Once when he was caught red-handed raping his wife (Sadiah’s) slave (Mary), out of wedlock, he reprimanded Sadiah for ‘making a big thing out of it.’ Muhammad and his companions frequently raided unsuspecting villages, (even those who had peace treaties with him) decapitating the men, and taking their wives, sons/daughters as slaves, ‘the best always for himself’ according to the Quran. In Sahih Bukhari’s Hadith, when some thieves were caught, Muhammad ordered his companions to dig out both eyes of each thief, and sent them away, blind and bleeding. Out of the 68 wars Muhammad and his companions fought, only one was defensive and the remaining 67 were offensive wars initiated by Muhammad and his companions
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)